Trend, Territory and Talent: A Strategic Triad for Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Design-Driven Innovation
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Diseño Industrial
Emprendimiento Sostenible
Innovación Impulsada por Diseño
Capacidades Dinámicas
Sostenibilidad

How to Cite

Sotelo Barrios, M. E., & Monsalve Jaimes, S. J. . (2026). Trend, Territory and Talent: A Strategic Triad for Sustainable Entrepreneurship and Design-Driven Innovation. Formación Estratégica, 7(2), 84–99. Retrieved from https://formacionestrategica.com/index.php/foes/article/view/253

Abstract

This article proposes the Trend–Territory–Talent (3T) triad as a theoretical and methodological framework for strengthening sustainable project formulation and supporting its transition into design-driven ventures. The study responds to the need to broaden the conventional role of industrial design beyond the formal and functional development of products and to understand it as a strategic capability for anticipating change, interpreting territorial conditions, and mobilizing human and organizational capabilities. A semi-systematic literature review was conducted using Scopus and Web of Science. The initial search retrieved 2,846 records; after duplicate removal and the application of screening, eligibility, quality, impact, and relevance criteria, a final analytical corpus of 47 articles was established. The thematic synthesis revealed six insufficiently integrated knowledge domains: sustainable entrepreneurship, sustainability innovation, sustainable business models, design for sustainability, design-driven innovation, and capability-based territorial innovation. These findings informed the development of the 3T model. Trend supports the recognition of emerging signals and future-oriented opportunities; Territory provides resources, identity, institutional conditions, and contextual legitimacy; and Talent activates the creative, technical, entrepreneurial, and relational capabilities required for implementation. The main theoretical contribution is the concept of 3T strategic coherence, defined as the alignment between future relevance, territorial embeddedness, and execution capacity. The study concludes that industrial design can operate as a territorial strategic capability that connects sustainability, innovation, and entrepreneurship, enabling isolated projects to evolve into value propositions with economic, environmental, and social transformation potential.

PDF (Español (España))

References

Albornoz-Arias, N., Contreras-Velásquez, J. C., Espinosa-Castro, J. F., & Sotelo Barrios, M. E. (2021). Capacidades emprendedoras en población de la base de la pirámide en Cúcuta, Colombia. Contaduría y Administración, 66(1), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.22201/fca.24488410e.2020.21883

Anderson, T. L., & Leal, D. R. (1997). Enviro-capitalists: Doing good while doing well. Rowman & Littlefield.

Battilana, J., Leca, B., & Boxenbaum, E. (2009). How actors change institutions: Towards a theory of institutional entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Annals, 3(1), 65-107. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520903053598

Bennett, S. J. (1991). Ecopreneuring: The complete guide to small business opportunities from the environmental revolution. John Wiley & Sons.

Berle, G. (1991). The green entrepreneur: Business opportunities that can save the earth and make you money. Liberty Hall Press.

Blue, R. J. (1990). Ecopreneuring: Managing for results. Scott, Foresman.

Bocken, N. M. P., de Pauw, I., Bakker, C., & van der Grinten, B. (2016). Product design and business model strategies for a circular economy. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33(5), 308-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2016.1172124

Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014). A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 42-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039

Ceschin, F., & Gaziulusoy, İ. (2016). Evolution of design for sustainability: From product design to design for system innovations and transitions. Design Studies, 47, 118-163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2016.09.002

Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the Environment, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428

Cohen, B., Smith, B., & Mitchell, R. (2008). Toward a sustainable conceptualization of dependent variables in entrepreneurship research. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(2), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.505

Cohen, B., & Winn, M. I. (2007). Market imperfections, opportunity and sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 29-49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2004.12.001

Dean, T. J., & McMullen, J. S. (2007). Toward a theory of sustainable entrepreneurship: Reducing environmental degradation through entrepreneurial action. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(1), 50-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2005.09.003

Figge, F., Hahn, T., Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2002). The sustainability balanced scorecard—Linking sustainability management to business strategy. Business Strategy and the Environment, 11(5), 269-284. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.339

Foray, D. (2014). From smart specialisation to smart specialisation policy. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(4), 492–507. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2014-0096

Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

Geissdoerfer, M., Morioka, S. N., de Carvalho, M. M., & Evans, S. (2018). Business models and supply chains for the circular economy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 712-721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.159

Geissdoerfer, M., Savaget, P., Bocken, N. M. P., & Hultink, E. J. (2017). The circular economy—A new sustainability paradigm? Journal of Cleaner Production, 143, 757-768. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.048

Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018). Sustainable business model innovation: A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 198, 401–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240

Hall, J. K., Daneke, G. A., & Lenox, M. J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2010.01.002

Hart, S. L. (1995). A natural-resource-based view of the firm. Academy of Management Review, 20(4), 986-1014. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9512280033

Hart, S. L., & Milstein, M. B. (2003). Creating sustainable value. Academy of Management Executive, 17(2), 56–67. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.2003.10025194

Hockerts, K., & Wüstenhagen, R. (2010). Greening Goliaths versus emerging Davids—Theorizing about the role of incumbents and new entrants in sustainable entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 481- 492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.005

Isaak, R. A. (1999). Green logic: Ecopreneurship, theory, and ethics. Kumarian Press.

Keogh, P. D., & Polonsky, M. J. (1998). Environmental commitment: A basis for environmental entrepreneurship? Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(1), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819810369563

Lober, D. J. (1998). Pollution prevention as corporate entrepreneurship. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(1), 26-37. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819810369554

Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 36-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2005.09.002

Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

Pacheco, D. F., Dean, T. J., & Payne, D. S. (2010). Escaping the green prison: Entrepreneurship and the creation of opportunities for sustainable development. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 464-480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2009.07.006

Pastakia, A. (1998). Grassroots ecopreneurs: Change agents for a sustainable society. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 11(2), 157–173. https://doi.org/10.1108/09534819810212142

Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1–2), 62–77.

Porter, M. E., & van der Linde, C. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment–competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97

Quintero-Quintero, W., Garzón-Castrillón, M. A., & Sotelo-Barrios, M. E. (2021). Gestión del conocimiento en universidades: Un análisis bibliométrico. Desarrollo Gerencial, 13(2), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.13.2.5499

Schaltegger, S. (2002). A framework for ecopreneurship: Leading bioneers and environmental managers to ecopreneurship. Greener Management International, 38, 45-58.

Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2011). Sustainable entrepreneurship and sustainability innovation: Categories and interactions. Business Strategy and the Environment, 20(4), 222-237. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.682

Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (R. Opie, Trans.). Harvard University Press. (Original work published 1911)

Siddaway, A. P., Wood, A. M., & Hedges, L. V. (2019). How to do a systematic review: A best practice guide for conducting and reporting narrative reviews, meta-analyses, and meta-syntheses. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 747–770. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Sotelo Barrios, M. E., Monsalve Jaimes, S. J., & Ramon Valencia, J. D. (2024). Desarrollo urbano sostenible: Integración del ecodiseño, la arquitectura bioclimática y la ingeniería ambiental para ciudades resilientes. FACE: Revista de la Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, 24(3), 130-137. https://doi.org/10.24054/face.v24i3.3307

Sotelo Barrios, M. E., Quintero Quintero, W., & Arévalo Ascanio, J. G. (2022). Innovación abierta: Un análisis bibliométrico. Desarrollo Gerencial, 14(2), 1-33. https://doi.org/10.17081/dege.14.2.5814

Sotelo-Barrios, M. E., Barrientos-Monsalve, E. J., & Monsalve-Jaime, S. J. (2026). Usuarios, digitalización y sostenibilidad, nuevas prácticas de la innovación abierta en el desarrollo de nuevos productos. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 11, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir-2026-1938

Sotelo-Barrios, M. E., Monsalve-Jaimes, S. J., & Barrientos-Monsalve, E. J. (2025). Metodologías en proyectos de bioclimática y el ecodiseño para la mejora de las condiciones de confort térmico en hábitats. Respuestas, 30(2), 121–130. https://doi.org/10.22463/0122820X.4688

Teece, D. J. (1986). Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Research Policy, 15(6), 285-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2

Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: The nature and microfoundations of sustainable enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319-1350. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.640

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7%3C509::AID-SMJ882%3E3.0.CO;2-Z

Utterback, J. M. (1994). Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Harvard Business School Press.

Verganti, R. (2008). Design, meanings, and radical innovation: A metamodel and a research agenda. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(5), 436–456. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5885.2008.00313.x

Verganti, R. (2009). Design-driven innovation: Changing the rules of competition by radically innovating what things mean. Harvard Business Press.

Zahra, S. A., Gedajlovic, E., Neubaum, D. O., & Shulman, J. M. (2009). A typology of social entrepreneurs: Motives, search processes and ethical challenges. Journal of Business Venturing, 24(5), 519-532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.04.007

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.